Online Video Doesn’t Have to Be Expensive

Lacking it May Cost You More

There is a common perception that getting into online video has to be expensive for businesses. That is not the case, however. In fact, it might even cost you more going into the future by not getting into it.

We’ve discussed before that videos might even help your rankings. This is something that ReelSEO’s Grant Crowell talked about, as well as YouTube’s Matt Liu. Not only is YouTube the 2nd largest search engine (and it pays to rank there), but using YouTube can also help you rank in Google.

Here’s a WebProNews interview with Liu (read more YouTube tips here):


 SEO-PR’s Greg Jarboe sat down with Mike McDonald at Search Engine Strategies last week and discussed why online video is important and why it doesn’t have to be costly:


Forrester’s Sucharita Mulpuru also recently provided some tips for getting started quickly with videos:

– Easy, short talking points

    – Brief, impactful video (i.e. 1-2 minutes maximum) is all you need

– Use your own employees or vendors

– Leverage inexpensive technology

    – iMac, digital camcorders

    – Need not be executed in a professional studio

– Costs are primarily editing labor and server capacity for most basic executions

Please allow me to rehash something I wrote for WebProNews recently: Video is not just something people are seeking out. It’s something people are sharing with each other, which is a key thing to remember. Yahoo is even embedding video in its SERPs, and Gmail is offering a feature that allows users to view YouTube videos in their email messages. And of course they can be embedded all over the web and shared across social networks.

Like Jarboe says, videos don’t always have to be viral to serve a purpose, but with so many ways for them to be shared, the opportunities for something to break viral are seemingly endless.

There are 4 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Jerry Smith

    Great points – video is attractive and easy to embed on a site and gets the message across quickly. Like many things there is a temptation not to put something out there unless it is "perfect" but actually if you have a good message, the production doesn’t need to be TV quality. People will forgive some technical imperfections if what you say is valuable.

    Video seems to be a great way for your audience to get to know you and see you in action!

  2. CLIENTELEVISION, my online video network, really lowers the cost of using video to enhance online marketing efforts.

    CLIENTELEVISION.com produces high-quality professional videos on such topics as insurance, real estate, finance, employment law, criminal justice, entrepreneurship, and consumer protection. To help professionals market the work they provide in these areas, we license these videos to insurance brokers, lawyers, accountants, financial planners, real estate agents, human
    resources consultants and a range of other professionals for use on their own websites.

    In fact, you can even register to use a limited selection of our videos for free.  But the annual fee to license a custom channel is a mere fraction of the cost of custom video production.  So this is a great way to use online video, make a strong, professional impression, and save money at the same time.

  3. I forgot to mention that the customized channels available through CLIENTELEVISION enable you to use your own branding (name and logo) on the video screen itself.  This way, every time a visitor clicks on a video, they are constantly reminded of your firm and its services.

  4. Very insightful post, with video we are definitely able to move to a new style of communication. Its unfortunate that certain companies are unable to jump onboard due to traditionally minded views shunning new technology instead of embracing it.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>