Make Your Banner Ads Count.Many people think that banner advertising on the Internet is all but dead. They cite things like "banner blindness" and lack of conversions.
I'll say this: Poor and ineffective banner advertising is dead. And guess what. It was never alive to begin with. Banner advertising itself is alive and well. Why else do you think you still see it everywhere?
Yes, "banner blindness" exists, but your job as an advertiser is to cure it. This means coming up with an ad that people can't help but acknowledge.
Commanding Attention
It only makes sense that before you get a potential customer to click on an ad, you have to command their attention. An easy approach to this is to display an attractive eye-catching ad (ok, perhaps this is easier said than done). Common approaches to this technique are to use animation and "flashy" interactive ads.
Sometimes Simple is Better
Sometimes however, simple ads can be more effective. I had a conversation with Susan Coppersmith, the director of ad sales at our own iEntry, and she brought up the point that sometimes simple can command just as much attention as a flashy ad. For this to work though, I believe that the ad has to inspire curiosity - the need to find out more.
Garbage Clicks Don't Count
When displaying your banner ads, remember you're in it to win it. In other words, if you're not going to win the clicker's business, what is the point? This is where targeting comes into play. You may put up the most beautiful and exciting ad ever created, but if it's not displayed in the right place it is simply going to be ineffective.
This is also true for irrelevant ads. By this, I mean if the ad has little or nothing to do with the actual landing page, you are most likely not going to get a conversion. An example that comes to mind is the type of ad you see all the time that encourages clicks by featuring some kind of a mini game. Shoot the duck, or something like that. It may inspire people to click just because they want to "shoot the duck", but when that is their only intention, what is it really going to get you? They're not going to buy anything from you. When they get to your landing page, they're going to say to themselves, "Why did I just do that?" and turn around and go back to the page they were on. Those are "garbage clicks".
That's not to say however, that if such an ad is placed on a well targeted site, they may "shoot the duck" and land on something they are in fact interested in. So if you can entice them into clicking an ad and actually deliver a well-targeted product, then more power to you.
It's Not Just About the Clicks
Of course, clicks and conversions aren't the only important factors in banner advertising. The branding that banner ads can provide can be much more valuable than an immediate conversion. And if you advertise in the right place, it can build your reputation in the subconcious of potential customers. "Advertising in a reputable network can be of great advantage to a small company. This leads to building credibility which will lead to sales in the long run," says Coppersmith. "You're often perceived to be as good as the company you keep."
Even if they ignore your ad as a result of "banner blindness", that doesn't mean that your company isn't leaving an impression in the back of their mind. Perhaps they don't have a need for you right then anyway. But should the need for what you provide arise in the future, they just might recall seeing your logo somewhere and associate you with that very need. Isn't that priceless?
In the End...
So in the end, whether you take the flashy route or the simple one with your ads, remember, it's all about targeting the right people as well as burning your brand into their minds. As far as instant gratification, if the clicker gets to your landing page and doesn't find the product interesting, it doesn't matter how good your ad looks. But keep in mind that while immediate conversions are great, that isn't all there is to it.
Which type of ad do you prefer to avoid banner blindness - flashy ones or simple ones?
Comments
A little Distasteful
I always enjoy your articles and email newsletters, but I have to say I find your picture a little distasteful as manipulating yourself to appear blind is bordering inappropriate. I have noticed this appears in my email newsletter and not on the original article, where 2 appropriate pictures are.
Ditto on Distaste
I too love the articles. Having worked with the visually impaired the picture is not something I'd support unless this is your actual photo (which I'm guessing not having seen previous photos). From a marketing perspective, it makes me question maturity of both the individuals and the company.
Move on from this and keep bringing us great thinking and information.
Derick
Thanks for reading...
Thanks for reading. . . .
Sad thing here is that it is a great title and great article. You simply killed yourself with imagery. If you look at your blog posting with the blind folded image (spot on) versus the email choice, it impacts your brand and image! That is everything on the web.
Instead of trying to defend it. . . .take it as a living example and write your next article about brand and image on the web. I think it would be a great thing and I'd be more than happy to co-author (some of my customer examples) or actually post on my blog about it and do some back and forth.
You have great content . . . focus on that and take the lesson learned on this one.
Derick
Focusing on content
I'm still comfortable with our brand (including the element of author pics that relate to the article that is kind of something we do all the time) and I have discussed branding a number of times (and surely will more in the future).
You say I have great content (thank you again - i really do mean that) and that I should focus on that. Well, that is exactly what I have done. Much more time was spent on the content than on the image in question and the content is all I've tried to focus on. Even the image itself was only created to emphasize the content. Those bringing up the image are turning focus away from the content. I would love to get some comments regarding the topic of the article. Some people don't care for the image. Point taken.
Any opinions on banner ad design?
I don't see a problem
I don't see a problem with your picutre (no pun intended)!? Wow, these guys are being very sensitive.
You know me...
I prefer simple banner ads
I prefer simple banner ads to overly flashy ones. To me it's all about content. If the banner ads displayed relate in some way to the contents of the webpage, then I think a few tastefull banners are appropriate.
Thanks!
Don't buy the lie...
Hi Chris,
Man, what a bunch of wusses carrying on about the imagery... Get over it people - this is taking political correctness to new lows! It's obvious that the pic ties in with the title of the article, with NO offence intended to the blind.
Are blind people that weak & ineffectual that they can't think for themselves & form their own opinions about whether this is "rude" or inappropriate?
Like Chris, I'm also an asthmatic & I wouldn't cry like a baby because someone showed an image of someone with an inhaler!!!
Now, onto the article:
Yes, I do agree that "typical" banners do suck and are a waste of time. You need to come up with something far more subtle & intelligent.
Something I have recently experimented with using Google AdWords image ads is actually writing up a small paragraph with a title that is coloured blue and underlined, so it looks exactly like a live link for an article or similar.
I create these in MS Word, then do a screen capture using SnagIt, and upload that as my "banner".
These look much more natural on a page than flash animations (ducks or otherwise) or chintzy graphics, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, they have totally kicked butt!
The cost/conversion of these ads was nearly 1/4 of that of my very best "normal" google adword ad (whether on the content network or not).
However Chris, one thing you did write that I totally DON'T agree with is:
"Even if they ignore your ad as a result of "banner blindness", that doesn't mean that your company isn't leaving an impression in the back of their mind. Perhaps they don't have a need for you right then anyway. But should the need for what you provide arise in the future, they just might recall seeing your logo somewhere and associate you with that very need. Isn't that priceless?"
As far as I am concerned, this is a lie perpetuated by overpriced underperforming ad agencies - people who have NO IDEA how to truly sell & persuade.
The ONLY purpose of an ad is to persuade & intrigue enough so that the viewer will take the next action you want, which is (usually) to click on your ad.
If you can't put a $ value on the ROI of your ads, you're wasting your money!
Don't fall for the trap of believing that leaving an impression in the back of their mind is priceless! I'd prefer a viewer who took action ANYTIME over someone who got some sort of warm & fuzzy subconscious feeling over seeing my ad.
You only have to look at McDonalds to see that they're smart about this. Yes, they run a lot of image advertising, but it's almost always in conjunction with a call to action, offering something special to the viewer, whether it's a toy with a happy meal, or a new you-beaut burger you "just got to have", etc.
Learn a lesson from the golden arches - just say NO to pure branding in the hopes it will infuse the subconscious of the viewer with happy thoughts!
OK, back to the salt mines :-)
Eran Malloch
WCR Internet Marketing
Post new comment